Tagged: Global Governance

Local and Global

I was recently invited to contribute to an Australian magazine about the relationship between local and global, where I addressed the false choice between the two that can often undermine social activism.

To behave sustainably, so the three divergent interests of business, society and environment are maintained in balance, markets need governance!  Moreover, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to realise that, to be effective, governance has to be on the same scale as the market it’s trying to govern. A global economy needs global governance. Absent that governance, it shouldn’t surprise us that the market runs riot, goes pathological, and causes all sorts of negative fall-out, much of which is increasingly felt in local communities. This isn’t some crack-pot call for world government. Rather it’s simply a call to practical global cooperation: that nations need to coordinate their policies so that they achieve global coverage and global effect.

Read the full piece on their website.

Cooperating with the future

How important is democracy in securing binding cooperation for a more sustainable future? Increasingly, behavioural science is offering some fascinating insights into the reasons why we cooperate, the precedent for cooperation in human beings and, now, the relationship between democracy and cooperation for binding long-term agreements. Politicians take note…


Read the full article about the research on Nature.

Cosmopolitanism and the evolution of the Nation State

A review of “Sail on, o Ship of State”

"Sail on, o ship of state", Eds. J. Möhring and G. Prins, Notting Hill Editions, 2013

“Sail on, o ship of state”, Eds. J. Möhring and G. Prins, Notting Hill Editions, 2013

Sail on, o Ship of State is a compilation of short essays about the nation-state – its past, present, and future. Written by 13 experts and topped with a preface by Michael Gove it represents, as a whole, a strong defence of the nation-state in the face of globalisation.

The book gets its pro-nation-state slant from the majority of contributions which come from ardent believers in national independence and autonomy; a school of thought known in International Relations circles as “Realism”. The contrary view, that of the Liberal (and the Cosmopolitan) traditions is comparatively under-represented. This makes for a somewhat lop-sided view of the nation-state in the 21st century.

For Realism, globalisation poses a dilemma because it brings nations ever-closer together. As firm believers in independent, competing nation-states, Realists see any further evolution towards the global as suspicious because it implies cooperation and what they see as a lessening of national independence and autonomy. Cosmopolitans, on the other hand, believe that in our increasingly interconnected world, in which we face common threats like climate change, forms of global cooperation and governance are both desirable and necessary.

Being skewed towards the Realist view, the book risks misrepresenting the position of many Cosmopolitans by suggesting they believe nation-states will (or should) disappear. Right on the front cover, the book declares that “The nation state has refused to shuffle off the stage of history”. But is that really what Cosmopolitans are suggesting? Continue reading